"witty subject line about logging feature"
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-07-22 00:57:22 CEST
Several of us had some more real-time discussion in IRC today about
"Perhaps the problem here is that we're designing from the bottom
So let's try this from the top-down. What problem(s) are we trying to
Here's what the Chicago office thinks the main problem is:
* svnserve currently has no logging at all, and apache's logging is
* both svn server processes need a way to log "high-level" actions:
- what conceptual requests were made (i.e. update, commit, etc.)
And here's the Chicago office's design goals:
A. Make it easy for any svn-related program to log messages to a
B. Make it possible for svn-related programs to log messages to
C. Make it possible to integrate with OS-level logging facilities
I think ghudson is trying to solve the same problem, but has
A. Only svnserve needs logging. mod_dav_svn can just log new
B. svnserve shouldn't reinvent logging, it should intergrate with
I don't think the problem is in question. But perhaps we should try
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.