Re: "witty subject line about logging feature"

--On July 21, 2005 5:57:22 PM -0500 Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@collab.net>
wrote:

> A. Only svnserve needs logging. mod_dav_svn can just log new
> things to apache's already existing logs.
>
> B. svnserve shouldn't reinvent logging, it should intergrate with
> existing OS logging facilities.

+1.

What would be wrong with the ra_layer (server-side) sending down a baton
function that could either write to syslog() (in the case of ra_svn) or
ap_log_rerror() (in the case of ra_svn/mod_dav_svn). Enforcing that
Subversion/mod_dav_svn write its output to something other than httpd's error
log seems, well, odd. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 24 23:34:43 2005