Re: "witty subject line about logging feature"

On Friday 22 July 2005 00:57, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> A. Only svnserve needs logging. mod_dav_svn can just log new
> things to apache's already existing logs.

I'm just a user, but I see a problem here: if someone would access a
repository through both svnserve and WebDAV then he would end up with two log
files to look at.

> B. svnserve shouldn't reinvent logging, it should intergrate with
> existing OS logging facilities.

... if available. But implementing "log to file" should be quite trivial in
cases where syslog/Windows event log is not available.

C'ya,
        Marc

-- 
Marc Haisenko
Systemspezialist
Webport IT-Services GmbH
mailto: haisenko@webport.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org