Re: [PATCH] Issue 1628

On 7/22/05, SteveKing <steveking@gmx.ch> wrote:
> The names of the functions are the same as used in the dll. I don't
> think it's a good idea to change the name (would that even work?) or the
> param names (that would work).
I suspected this -- that's why I asked :) There's no need to change
the function names or param names, but we could put the typedef
declarations in a separate (Win32-specific) header file, so as to keep
the style of the cmdline.c file consistent. Ideas?

> So I think if you really want this, you should just change those little things yourself.
Thanks for your patch. :) I will not have a chance to work on this,
because I'm focusing on the bindings this summer. But hopefully
another committer will pick up on this.

Cheers,

David

-- 
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org