Re: lost revision?

 
> > What I meant was: Why does it *require* a path? Or in other words:
> > Why, when no path is given, does it implicitly take "." as path
> > instead of working on the repository per se? Is there some reason I do
> > not see (perhaps consistency with other commands), or is this simply
> > what seemed to make sense when it was first implemented? Or something
> > else?
>
> I think that might be a better behavior than implicit `.', yes.

why? are there other svn commands which default to the repository if
no arguments are given?

implicit '.' makes sense to me, by analogy with 'svn up'.

-brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 1 17:16:57 2002