[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: lost revision?

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-11-01 06:33:15 CET

Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev@pflugmann.de> writes:
> Thank you for answering. That's how I understood it already. Sorry
> that I was not more explicit about that.
>
> The original answer why the command (svn diff -rM:N) may give no
> output was a technical description how it currently works. And I
> wanted to know, why it works as it does.
>
> What I meant was: Why does it *require* a path? Or in other words:
> Why, when no path is given, does it implicitly take "." as path
> instead of working on the repository per se? Is there some reason I do
> not see (perhaps consistency with other commands), or is this simply
> what seemed to make sense when it was first implemented? Or something
> else?

I think that might be a better behavior than implicit `.', yes.

See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=960 for why
it's hard right now :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 1 07:04:54 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.