[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS performance on NAS/NFS

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-03-09 18:19:24 CET

On 3/9/07, Dave Camp <dcamp@mac.com> wrote:
> If you search the users list, you will find that many people are of
> the opinion that you should only use BDB if you don't care about your
> data. FSFS does not have the stability issues that svn + bdb has.
> Most of the posts about "my BDB repository has crashed" are usually
> answered with "switch to FSFS".

Yes, but that has to do with the fact that unexperienced users
shouldn't try to administer an environment as complex as bdb. The
posting of the message itself is a sign the user may belong in the
group of FSFS users.



PS: Admin overhead of FSFS is *much* lower that for BDB. That doesn't
say our BDB backend isn't good for some (many) users.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 9 18:19:53 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.