[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS performance on NAS/NFS

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-03-09 19:02:26 CET

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Dave Camp <dcamp@mac.com> wrote:
>> If you search the users list, you will find that many people are of
>> the opinion that you should only use BDB if you don't care about your
>> data. FSFS does not have the stability issues that svn + bdb has.
>> Most of the posts about "my BDB repository has crashed" are usually
>> answered with "switch to FSFS".
> Yes, but that has to do with the fact that unexperienced users
> shouldn't try to administer an environment as complex as bdb.

Or that the experienced users have had bad experiences with bdb...
I have, but it was many versions ago and in a different context so
perhaps it no longer applies. I still tend to not trust it for any data
that may grow during updates, requiring the values to be relocated.

   Les Mikesell
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 9 19:02:47 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.