[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bug #898 priority questions (Was "Re: Timeframe for 1.4")

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-02-13 19:26:14 CET

Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006Q1@ryandesign.com> writes:
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 22:14, Ted Stern wrote:
>
> > I'm interested in the status of bug #898. My organization will
> > likewise wait for it to be dealt with (1.4 or later) before converting
> > from CVS to svn, unfortunately.
> >
> > - How do I find out whether someone has been assigned to the bug?
>
> The bug seems to be assigned to "issues@subversion" so I presume that
> means no individual has been assigned to it.
>
> The end of the bug notes says a branch was started for this [1], but
> it looks like there's been no activity in 4 months.
>
> [1] http://svn.collab.net/viewcvs/svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames/
>
>
> > - Bug #898 has 52 votes. How do I see how that compares to other open
> > bugs?
>
> The developers have said before that they don't take the votes into
> consideration when deciding what features to work on, unfortunately.

Slow progress on this one. See r18447, which added
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion/libsvn_fs_base/notes/atomic-moves-proposal.txt

Best,
-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 13 21:08:55 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.