[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bug #898 priority questions (Was "Re: Timeframe for 1.4")

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006Q1_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: 2006-02-08 23:41:17 CET

On Feb 8, 2006, at 22:14, Ted Stern wrote:

> I'm interested in the status of bug #898. My organization will
> likewise wait for it to be dealt with (1.4 or later) before converting
> from CVS to svn, unfortunately.
> - How do I find out whether someone has been assigned to the bug?

The bug seems to be assigned to "issues@subversion" so I presume that
means no individual has been assigned to it.

The end of the bug notes says a branch was started for this [1], but
it looks like there's been no activity in 4 months.

[1] http://svn.collab.net/viewcvs/svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames/

> - Bug #898 has 52 votes. How do I see how that compares to other open
> bugs?

The developers have said before that they don't take the votes into
consideration when deciding what features to work on, unfortunately.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 8 23:43:22 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.