Re: svn co performance

On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:29, Paul Koning wrote:

> That was a bit different -- it was http performance. I'm now using
> svnserve, which is clearly better than http in all cases. But it's
> still 1/2 the speed of CVS for checkout. (It's faster than CVS in all
> other cases I have tried, which certainly helps.)

I believe what we've learned on this list is that Subversion is
slower than CVS for checkouts but faster for most other things, and
that this is an acceptable trade-off because you generally make new
working copies infrequently but update them frequently.

There was this thread a few months ago which may have more-specific
info for you:

http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-06/0753.shtml

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 29 16:23:49 2005