On 10/29/05, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2005@ryandesign.com> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2005, at 22:29, Paul Koning wrote:
> I believe what we've learned on this list is that Subversion is
> slower than CVS for checkouts but faster for most other things, and
> that this is an acceptable trade-off because you generally make new
> working copies infrequently but update them frequently.
Although it's true I tend to update more frequently than checkout, I
still checkout quite frequently since I tend to create new workspaces
for each medium- to large-scale task. Doing this allows me to work
independently on several tasks. OTOH, since I am working concurrently
on several tasks, I'm able to do a new checkout "in the background".
MTC,
Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 29 16:53:51 2005