Re: Alternative for svn mv command?

On 10/10/05, Tomas Gonzalez <tegonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be better to have the svn mv command default to using a svn
> cp orig new followed by a svn rm orig, rather than add & delete? For
> branching and merging, it is best to maintain the full history of the
> file so that branches can be logically integrated. (ie. perforce
> methodology) If the renamed file is deleted and re-added, it looses
> its ancestry...
>
> Comments?
>

svn mv behaves exactly like what you want (copy following by remove).

--
-Hari Kodungallur
SpikeSource Inc.
http://developer.spikesource.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org