[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Alternative for svn mv command?

From: Hari Kodungallur <hkodungallur_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-10-11 01:17:33 CEST

On 10/10/05, Tomas Gonzalez <tegonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be better to have the svn mv command default to using a svn
> cp orig new followed by a svn rm orig, rather than add & delete? For
> branching and merging, it is best to maintain the full history of the
> file so that branches can be logically integrated. (ie. perforce
> methodology) If the renamed file is deleted and re-added, it looses
> its ancestry...
> Comments?

svn mv behaves exactly like what you want (copy following by remove).

-Hari Kodungallur
SpikeSource Inc.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 11 01:20:08 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.