[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Alternative for svn mv command?

From: Tomas Gonzalez <tegonzalez_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-10-11 00:32:50 CEST

Would it be better to have the svn mv command default to using a svn
cp orig new followed by a svn rm orig, rather than add & delete? For
branching and merging, it is best to maintain the full history of the
file so that branches can be logically integrated. (ie. perforce
methodology) If the renamed file is deleted and re-added, it looses
its ancestry...


Please reply to: tegonzalez @t gmail d0t com



To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 11 01:10:11 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.