My mistake. Thank you for the clarification.
-Tomas
On 10/10/05, Hari Kodungallur <hkodungallur@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/05, Tomas Gonzalez <tegonzalez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would it be better to have the svn mv command default to using a svn
> > cp orig new followed by a svn rm orig, rather than add & delete? For
> > branching and merging, it is best to maintain the full history of the
> > file so that branches can be logically integrated. (ie. perforce
> > methodology) If the renamed file is deleted and re-added, it looses
> > its ancestry...
> >
> > Comments?
> >
>
> svn mv behaves exactly like what you want (copy following by remove).
>
>
> --
> -Hari Kodungallur
> SpikeSource Inc.
> http://developer.spikesource.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 11 19:51:45 2005