[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.10 RC1?

From: Paul Hammant <paul_at_hammant.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 19:08:08 -0500

I think you're misunderstanding me. I noted this in the conversation above:
"One conflict option that's *not done yet* is one that merges a textual
change from a path ^/trunk/B to a path ^/branch/A, after a move A -> B on
trunk. I don't consider this a release blocker. We can always add this
option in a patch release."

I interpreted that comment to be about something merged/integrated that
should not go ahead just yet, and deserving of some consideration.

I felt I had a suggestion that may be helpful to allow the release of
something alpha/beta/RC-ish to go ahead even with something the team felt
wasn't ready for release.

To reiterate: I agree the feature is useful and I have nothing to say that
I would wish to have interpreted as a concern, was trying to help speed
things up not slow things down.

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Is that a regression versus v1.9 and before?
> > >
> > > Far from it.
> > > This discussion is about the new conflict resovler added in 1.10.
> > >
> > > We can and always could perform such merges by manually specifying
> > > the paths, i.e. running a merge from ^/trunk/B to branch/A.
> > >
> > > The goal of the resolver is to make it easier to perform such merges
> > > in the straightforward 'svn merge ^/trunk' style.
> > >
> >
> > OK, so at the risk of representing *the department of unsolicited
> advice*,
> > I don't know why you would not ship with as 'off' but able to be toggled
> > 'on' client-side with a new option
> > --with-experimental-1-10-conflict-enhancement-technology
> > (or a better name). The 0.1% of users that want to play with it before it
> > is ready can do.
> >
> > - Paul
> Why? There's a lot of benefits in this feature. It has been worked on
> sicnce May 2015 and is already pretty useful. There's a high-level
> description in the 1.10 release notes, have you seen that?
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.10.html#
> conflict-resolver
> You're a bringing your concerns up a little late :)
> But I'm not even sure why you would have any concerns about this.

Paul Hammant DevOps <https://devops.paulhammant.com> Let me give your
enterprise a step by step plan to get out of the hell crazy branching
models (ClearCase maybe?) and into the world of high-throughput CD on
DevOps foundations.
Received on 2017-11-24 01:08:19 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.