On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > > Is that a regression versus v1.9 and before?
> > Far from it.
> > This discussion is about the new conflict resovler added in 1.10.
> > We can and always could perform such merges by manually specifying
> > the paths, i.e. running a merge from ^/trunk/B to branch/A.
> > The goal of the resolver is to make it easier to perform such merges
> > in the straightforward 'svn merge ^/trunk' style.
> OK, so at the risk of representing *the department of unsolicited advice*,
> I don't know why you would not ship with as 'off' but able to be toggled
> 'on' client-side with a new option
> (or a better name). The 0.1% of users that want to play with it before it
> is ready can do.
> - Paul
Why? There's a lot of benefits in this feature. It has been worked on
sicnce May 2015 and is already pretty useful. There's a high-level
description in the 1.10 release notes, have you seen that?
You're a bringing your concerns up a little late :)
But I'm not even sure why you would have any concerns about this.
Received on 2017-11-23 22:05:21 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev