RE: 1.8.x backport conflicts bot is red

I would have expected that the backport script would *only* look at the branch, as that is what would have to be merged once accepted.

Daniel?

Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: "Philip Martin" <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Sent: ‎28-‎2-‎2015 14:39
To: "Branko Čibej" <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Cc: "Subversion Development" <dev_at_subversion.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 1.8.x backport conflicts bot is red

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> I could change the proposal
> but I don't know if the backport script would then interpret Daniel's
> vote for the other revisions as approving the whole backport:

I don't think the backport script would do that but changing the
proposal looks like the wrong thing: the 'missing' revisions are
proposed for merge to 1.8.x just not from trunk. I suppose we could
change the backport script to also look for 'missing' revisions in the
commits made to the proposed branch.

-- 
Philip