Re: 1.8.x backport conflicts bot is red

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> I could change the proposal
> but I don't know if the backport script would then interpret Daniel's
> vote for the other revisions as approving the whole backport:

I don't think the backport script would do that but changing the
proposal looks like the wrong thing: the 'missing' revisions are
proposed for merge to 1.8.x just not from trunk. I suppose we could
change the backport script to also look for 'missing' revisions in the
commits made to the proposed branch.

-- 
Philip