On 24.08.2011 14:17, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> Having read the discussion elsethread, I now consider this a blocker and
>>> that also seems to be the consensus. So we can't release 1.7.0 with
>>> this bug; it has to be fixed. That in turn means the supposed 'RC1' is
>>> no longer an RC at all. [...]
>> So the grander feeling seems to be: scuttle rc1 (which already has the
>> votes for release)
> I interpreted Bert's "+1 as it passes regression tests but -1 to release
> as Subversion 1.7.0" the same as a "-1" vote for RC1, based on my
> understanding of the requirements for an RC.
>
> To make it plain, I hereby change my own RC1 vote to -1.
Looks like you guys are going to dither around a minor point so much
that the RC soak is going to last as long as the rest of the 1.7 cycle.
Are you quite sure you won't change your mind tomorrow? :)
-- Brane
Received on 2011-08-24 15:17:21 CEST