Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> > Having read the discussion elsethread, I now consider this a blocker and
> > that also seems to be the consensus. So we can't release 1.7.0 with
> > this bug; it has to be fixed. That in turn means the supposed 'RC1' is
> > no longer an RC at all. [...]
> So the grander feeling seems to be: scuttle rc1 (which already has the
> votes for release)
I interpreted Bert's "+1 as it passes regression tests but -1 to release
as Subversion 1.7.0" the same as a "-1" vote for RC1, based on my
understanding of the requirements for an RC.
To make it plain, I hereby change my own RC1 vote to -1.
> and reroll an rc2. The fix for the 'upgrade with
> lock' issue is already on 1.7.x, so we can do this pretty much
> whenever we'd like. I'm inclined to do it tomorrow, following the
> normal pattern.
+1 to that.
Received on 2011-08-24 14:17:44 CEST