Hi Hyrum,
My initial thought is;
"To favour results over process" is the wrong move.
Processes are sometimes in place to save us from ourselves.
Gavin.
On 10/08/2011, at 10:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> So, the only thing holding up this release is the lack of a Windows
> sig. While I don't like that situation, at this point I think it's
> foolishness to allow process to get in the way of progress in the
> release, so I'm tempted to move forward with the signatures we have.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Hyrum
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> No takers? With only the slightest of effort, you too could be one of
>> the signers of 1.7.0-beta3, and have your name immortalized in the
>> release announcement. Don't delay, test on your Windows box and sign
>> today!
>>
>> -Hyrum
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> FYI: We're still lacking one Windows sig for release.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all those who have tested and signed thus far.
>>>
>>> -Hyrum
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
>>>> signing: 1.7.0-beta3. The magic revision is r1154051 (but a known bug
>>>> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file).
>>>> You can find the tarballs here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-beta3/
>>>>
>>>> This is still a beta release, but is expected to be the last one.
>>>> Stability continues to improve, but as you may expect, these
>>>> prereleases are intended for intrepid users and testers only. We're
>>>> cutting this now, to allow folks to test and sign over the weekend, if
>>>> they'd like. To release, we need a complete set of 3 *nix and 3
>>>> Windows signatures.
>>>>
>>>> Please send sigs here:
>>>> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Hyrum
>>>>
>>>> PS - The revision-number-in-header file issue is expected to be fixed
>>>> for the release candidates.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>>>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>> http://www.uberSVN.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> http://www.uberSVN.com/
Received on 2011-08-10 14:34:29 CEST