So, the only thing holding up this release is the lack of a Windows
sig. While I don't like that situation, at this point I think it's
foolishness to allow process to get in the way of progress in the
release, so I'm tempted to move forward with the signatures we have.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> No takers? With only the slightest of effort, you too could be one of
> the signers of 1.7.0-beta3, and have your name immortalized in the
> release announcement. Don't delay, test on your Windows box and sign
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> FYI: We're still lacking one Windows sig for release.
>> Thanks to all those who have tested and signed thus far.
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
>>> signing: 1.7.0-beta3. The magic revision is r1154051 (but a known bug
>>> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file).
>>> You can find the tarballs here:
>>> This is still a beta release, but is expected to be the last one.
>>> Stability continues to improve, but as you may expect, these
>>> prereleases are intended for intrepid users and testers only. We're
>>> cutting this now, to allow folks to test and sign over the weekend, if
>>> they'd like. To release, we need a complete set of 3 *nix and 3
>>> Windows signatures.
>>> Please send sigs here:
>>> PS - The revision-number-in-header file issue is expected to be fixed
>>> for the release candidates.
>>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
>> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
> uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
Received on 2011-08-10 14:29:13 CEST