Re: serious bug: a succession of "svn up" can yield a working copy with local changes
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+svn_at_vinc17.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:36:50 +0200
Hi Stephen,
On 2009-08-05 16:13:56 +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:
Well, I've never used CVS for my personal files. The file comes in fact
I simply did the following in my SVN working copy:
$ cp <the_file_in_question> lplain.bst
Note: at that time, I didn't add an Id keyword. I added the keyword
> Creating a new file with that string in it, importing into a
Has this *always* been like that? It doesn't seem so.
> So it appears that your file is part of a repository generated
No, I didn't use such a tool. I did all my modifications with the
-- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2380482Received on 2009-08-05 16:37:10 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.