[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.co.il>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:06:29 +0300

Rui,

Rui, Guo wrote on Fri, 18 Apr 2008 at 14:31 +0800:
> [[[
> Added test case to verify the semantics of --depth on items that are either
> omitted in WC or not yet under version control.
>
...
> (depth_fold_expand_clean_trees): Fix a silly bug caused by copy/paste.
> The last expected_status assignment should be expected_disk.
>
> ]]]

Since fixing the copy/paste bug is independent of and unrelated to the
rest of the patch, HACKING's advice applies:

    "A patch submission should contain one logical change; please don't
    mix N unrelated changes in one submission €” send N separate emails
    instead."

You do not need to resubmit this one, however; I'm only pointing that
out for next time.

Thanks,

Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-18 09:07:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.