Re: [PATCH] Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

Hi Rui,

Rui, Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:37:01AM +0800, Rui, Guo wrote:
> +def pull_in_tree_with_depth_option(sbox):
> + """pull in sub tree with with --depth=immediates, expecting to see the depth
> + of the sub tree is set to immediates"""

The test doc string should not exceed 50 characters. You can make it as "verify
subtree with --depth=immediates".

> + wc_empty,ign_a, ign_b, ign_c = set_up_depthy_working_copies(sbox,
> + empty=True)

Check formatting here.

> + expected_disk = svntest.wc.State('', {
> + 'A' : Item(),
> + 'A/mu' : Item("This is the file 'mu'.\n"),
> + 'A/B' : Item(),
> + 'A/C' : Item(),
> + 'A/D' : Item(),

Check formatting here.

-- 
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org