[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

From: Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:28:48 +0800

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:06:29AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rui,
>
> Rui, Guo wrote on Fri, 18 Apr 2008 at 14:31 +0800:
> > [[[
> > Added test case to verify the semantics of --depth on items that are either
> > omitted in WC or not yet under version control.
> >
> ...
> > (depth_fold_expand_clean_trees): Fix a silly bug caused by copy/paste.
> > The last expected_status assignment should be expected_disk.
> >
> > ]]]
>
> Since fixing the copy/paste bug is independent of and unrelated to the
> rest of the patch, HACKING's advice applies:
>
> "A patch submission should contain one logical change; please don't
> mix N unrelated changes in one submission — send N separate emails
> instead."
>
> You do not need to resubmit this one, however; I'm only pointing that
> out for next time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
Thank you for figure this out. I won't do it againt.
Rui, Guo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-18 11:29:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.