Re: --pre-1.X-compatible and fsfs transaction counter

David Glasser wrote:
> On 7/27/07, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
>> It also may be safer to always put the revision number into the new 1.5
>> transaction ids (<rev>-<base36-sequence-number>), just in case there's something
>> else that hasn't been considered, as the current code works fine when this is done.
>
> Independently of the actual issue you're raising, I definitely find it
> to be helpful that fsfs txn ids have the revision number in them: it
> makes the out of date error messages slightly easier to understand,
> helps with svnadmin lstxns, etc.

Thanks. I'll definitely keep them in there then.

Blair

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 27 21:20:21 2007