Re: --pre-1.X-compatible and fsfs transaction counter

On 7/27/07, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
> It also may be safer to always put the revision number into the new 1.5
> transaction ids (<rev>-<base36-sequence-number>), just in case there's something
> else that hasn't been considered, as the current code works fine when this is done.

Independently of the actual issue you're raising, I definitely find it
to be helpful that fsfs txn ids have the revision number in them: it
makes the out of date error messages slightly easier to understand,
helps with svnadmin lstxns, etc.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org