Re: [PATCH] Destroy the APR subpool before every successful returnstatement
From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-01-08 13:36:30 CET
On 1/8/07, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
Well, you are correct in the usual case, but ...
> > Non-destruction of pools is valid when returning *in the error-case*,
... yes, except that these functions don't get a pool passed in: they
> If high memory use due to call fanout is an issue (and it pretty much
Except that this caller doesn't know the callee even uses a pool...
You could argue this should be rewritten, but that's much more
bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.