Re: Ruby COMPATIBILITY CONCERNS - Relevant to 1.4.0 release
From: David James <djames_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-07-15 19:38:47 CEST
On 7/15/06, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
The Ruby bindings don't make any compatibility promises. According to
I'd recommend reverting r20677, because it deletes a useful feature.
> This isn't anyone's deliberate fault, but collectively as a team, I
It's a good idea to define a compatibility policy. The Python bindings
Because SWIG generates code automatically, many of the APIs generated
How can we mark APIs as frozen? In the Mozilla project, they mark
After an API is frozen, we can still make changes to the API, as long
Cheers,
David
[1]: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/embedding/Mozilla_API_freezing.html
-- David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Jul 15 19:39:12 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.