[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.4.0-rc2 tarballs up for testing/signing

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2006-07-15 19:35:05 CEST

On 7/15/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> have no issues reported on list. But, in my mind, it's certainly okay
> to issue an 'early' RC that has *some* known issues that we fix up
> before the next RC. So, there's no need to have each RC be perfect
> and to have that hold up the release candidate being tested in other

Let me clarify my tenses. I mean that if we find an issue within an
hour or even a day after a RC has been rolled, we don't re-roll just
for that one problem. If we did that, we'd be constantly re-rolling
RCs for every minor bug and I view that as a waste of everyone's time.
 -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 15 19:37:02 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.