Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
>> It's legacy code, present as a developer convenience for working
>> practices long obsolete, and it caused a bug. Therefore it was removed.
>
> I view that "long obsolete" assertion as wildly incorrect and quite
> presumptuous. I, at least, have some WCs that have the apr and
> apr-util dirs underneath it (primarily client-only systems where I
> don't build httpd). On those systems, I just run Subversion's
> autogen.sh to trigger the APR and APR-util buildconf's. -- justin
Oh. I think we need a third party to intervene here - I think its pretty
clear we are never going to reach an agreement just between the two of us.
To my perspective, the above usage is just taking advantage of a bug.
I note that autogen.sh only buildconfs apr and apr-util - which is
inconsistent, as it doesn't try to handle neon.
Max.
Received on Sat Jul 15 19:53:11 2006