[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: confusion about largefile support

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2005-05-31 18:49:20 CEST

On May 31, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Greg Hudson wrote:
> However, we most definitely do need to seek around in FSFS rev files,
> which are the most common thing to go above 2GB. APR_LARGEFILE won't
> help us for that case.

Okay, so then there really is a risk here for very large
repositories, particularly ones using FSFS.

Should we start recommending that such projects upgrade to APR 1.X
(and httpd 2.1, if they're depending on mod_dav_svn?) Should we
write a FAQ about it?

Funny, KDE is using fsfs, and I would have expected them to run into
a >2GB revision file.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 31 18:50:29 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.