Re: confusion about largefile support

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> Okay, so then there really is a risk here for very large repositories,
> particularly ones using FSFS.
>
> Should we start recommending that such projects upgrade to APR 1.X (and
> httpd 2.1, if they're depending on mod_dav_svn?) Should we write a FAQ
> about it?

That seems reasonable to me.

> Funny, KDE is using fsfs, and I would have expected them to run into a
> >2GB revision file.

Well, it's only >2GB in a single revision, so depending on how they did
the conversion it's quite possible they just haven't hit one. Did they
do a cvs2svn conversion or did they just 'svn import' everything?

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 31 18:59:08 2005