Re: Misrepresentation of BerkeleyDB FS module as "base"

Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:

> $ svn --version
> svn, version 1.2.0 (dev build)
> compiled Mar 30 2005, 16:04:46
> [...snip ...]
> The following repository back-end (FS) modules are available:
>
> * fs_base : Module for working with a Berkeley DB repository.
> * fs_fs : Module for working with a plain file (FSFS) repository.

Shouldn't these match the name svnadmin --fs-type expects?

--
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 31 22:04:55 2005