Re: Misrepresentation of BerkeleyDB FS module as "base"

Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:

> Daniel Rall <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
>
> > $ svn --version
> > svn, version 1.2.0 (dev build)
> > compiled Mar 30 2005, 16:04:46
> > [...snip ...]
> > The following repository back-end (FS) modules are available:
> >
> > * fs_base : Module for working with a Berkeley DB repository.
> > * fs_fs : Module for working with a plain file (FSFS) repository.
>
> Shouldn't these match the name svnadmin --fs-type expects?

Yes, please.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 31 22:16:12 2005