Re: Misrepresentation of BerkeleyDB FS module as "base"

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 14:26, Daniel Rall wrote:
> I realize that this is legacy, and don't want to re-hash any old threads
> here, but why is the BerkeleyDB FS module named "fs_base" rather than
> "fs_bdb" (or the like)?

The theory is that libsvn_fs_base might some day be used for other
database-type back ends.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 31 21:22:30 2005