Re: svn 1.1.1 with r11211 - users perspective

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:
> I'll comment that if we didn't have a 'trusted' RM who is the same for
> every release, we should be voting to approve a release before it goes
> public. httpd does this (obviously). I think we've let things slide
> here because we have only one RM. But, if more people take the RM
> responsibility (which I think is ultimately a good thing), then a
> release should undergo some sanity tests before we make it live and
> announce it to the public. -- justin

+1

(We can make the appropriate changes to HACKING if/when we cross that
bridge.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 13 21:22:52 2004