[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking UI comments

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2004-10-13 21:26:58 CEST

--On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:06 PM +0100 Julian Foad
<julianfoad@btopenworld.com> wrote:

> Certainly not. The "svn:lock" property was proposed as a permanent
> indication that this is a file that ought to be locked before working on it,
> not as the indication that it is currently locked.

The problem is that according to WebDAV, we have to respond to the
lockdiscovery property on the resource in order to allow a query if there's an
outstanding lock. (This is what 'svn info' should do in order to query lock
info.) So, the question remains: does an implicit change of a live property
imply a change in our revnum? I could see it going either way. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 13 21:27:13 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.