Re: CHANGES: Suggestion

On Thursday 27 November 2003 17.18, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > Version 0.34.0 (released 3 December 2003, revision r7859)
>
> I know this is in the instruction, but I really don't see why the
> revision number would be interesting. The only reason it's still there
> is that it was needed a long time ago when Subversion did not support
> branches. The URL below is the only info you need to check out the
> release.
>
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.34.0

The revision number have been my frend for a long time and is (the way I
see it) a very valuable timesaver for tracking, talking, co, export and
much other stuff I can't remember or think of right now.
I like the revision number, and my impression is that revision numbers
are very importans for many users :-)

> > Please see the notes/repository_upgrade_HOWTO document located for
> > documentation on migrating pre-.34 repos to revision .34.
> >
> > Also located here:
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/repos_upgrade_HOWTO
>
> Maybe you can put this inside the nice box above?

Yes, the solution above is not to good (but not to bad either), I have to
think about it.

> > * berkeley-4.2.50 are now the recommended Berkeley version
>
> Maybe "Berkeley DB 4.2.50 is now the recommended version" or something
> similar would be better.

Done

> > * Big SSL server cert error prompt improvement (r7849)
>
> Drop the "Big". It wasn't that big. :-)

Done, thanks!

> I haven't checked if all fixed isses are mentioned, but it looks like
> a very nice first CHANGES file. Well done, Jostein!

@'.'@

J.

-- 
Jostein Chr. Andersen <jostein@josander.net>
http://www.josander.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org