Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Martin" <philip@codematters.co.uk>
>
> Any reason why this is separate from the existing notify callback?
> The existing notify callback has several "actions". How about
> changing the existing mechanism to use a union of structs, rather than
> a list of parameters. Then it would be fairly simple to extend it to
> handle progress notification as well.

Yes. The existing notify callback is always called _after_ the operation
on an item (file) is completed. Also, it is defined as a notification about
changes in the working copy.

On a sidenote: if you change the existing callback you won't be able
to implement progress information step by step but you'll have
to change the clients so that they are aware of that change in the
same step.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 17:27:17 2003