[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Ruby binding can't be built?

From: Thom May <thom_at_planetarytramp.net>
Date: 2003-01-07 22:02:57 CET

* Greg Stein (gstein@lyra.org) wrote :
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 01:55:49PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> >...
> > > library name fixes: s/apr-0/apr/, s/aprutil-0/aprutil/.
> > > Except classical apr path layout, no -0 suffix is used.
> >
> > this all looks fine from what i can see. i'll take a closer look
> > tonight, when i'm in front of a machine, and i'll commit everything
> > except the s/apr-0/apr/ s/aprutil-0/aprutil/ part. we build against the
> > stock apr/aprutil (at least theoretically). if debian wants to change
> > the names of the libraries, they'll have to patch this locally.
> Right. All platforms should use the -0 suffix; it was just an oversight that
> the .layout didn't get changed to include it.
> Thom: feel like tweaking config.layout?
Yeah. Hadaka pointed this one out to me ages ago on irc, i fixed it in the
packages (which are just waiting for 2.0.44) and then promptly forgot to do
so in tree ;-)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 7 22:04:01 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.