Re: Ruby binding can't be built?

On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 01:55:49PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
>...
> > library name fixes: s/apr-0/apr/, s/aprutil-0/aprutil/.
> > Except classical apr path layout, no -0 suffix is used.
>
> this all looks fine from what i can see. i'll take a closer look
> tonight, when i'm in front of a machine, and i'll commit everything
> except the s/apr-0/apr/ s/aprutil-0/aprutil/ part. we build against the
> stock apr/aprutil (at least theoretically). if debian wants to change
> the names of the libraries, they'll have to patch this locally.

Right. All platforms should use the -0 suffix; it was just an oversight that
the .layout didn't get changed to include it.

Thom: feel like tweaking config.layout?

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org