[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Ruby binding can't be built?

From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai_at_debian.or.jp>
Date: 2003-01-08 04:16:44 CET

At Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:02:57 +0000,
Thom May wrote:

> > > > library name fixes: s/apr-0/apr/, s/aprutil-0/aprutil/.
> > > > Except classical apr path layout, no -0 suffix is used.
> > >
> > > this all looks fine from what i can see. i'll take a closer look
> > > tonight, when i'm in front of a machine, and i'll commit everything
> > > except the s/apr-0/apr/ s/aprutil-0/aprutil/ part. we build against the
> > > stock apr/aprutil (at least theoretically). if debian wants to change
> > > the names of the libraries, they'll have to patch this locally.
> >
> > Right. All platforms should use the -0 suffix; it was just an oversight that
> > the .layout didn't get changed to include it.
> >
> > Thom: feel like tweaking config.layout?
> >
> Yeah. Hadaka pointed this one out to me ages ago on irc, i fixed it in the
> packages (which are just waiting for 2.0.44) and then promptly forgot to do
> so in tree ;-)

I see that debian layout is changed in
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/config.layout and
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr-util/config.layout
but why does other layouts, such as GNU, RedHat, SuSE or others still
remain not having libsuffix?

Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 8 04:17:42 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.