>Any objections to generating windows makefiles instead of
>project files?
I object, I'm doing daily builds with the source under Win32 and my entire
production line comes crashing down around my ears if you switch to
makefiles.
BUT it might be easier to generate VC7-style project files and have an XML
transform produce the DSP file.
>After a half decent Visual Studio 6, I thought Visual Studio .NET might
>be better. I couldn't have been more wrong...
At least the .NET project files are in XML, so you can transform them to
NAnt, DSP or SharpDevelop files.
The good news is that VS.2003 will have a major upgrade to ANSI C++
compliance. Boost and Loki are compiling!
John C Barstow
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 21 04:40:05 2002