[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge should copy-with-history

From: <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-08-12 12:58:53 CEST

Quoting William Uther <will+@cs.cmu.edu>:

>
> On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 08:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> > Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> >
> >> William Uther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 04:44 PM, Branko ibej wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> No, this is _exactly_ what should be happening.
> >>>>
> >>> I'm still not convinced.
>
> > What both of you (Nuuti and William) are missing is the following
> > horrible scenario
>
> Um, I wasn't missing it. I was trying to be careful and not say that
> the patch was bad, just that it wasn't perfect. Your "_exactly_" above
>
> implied that you thought this patch was perfect, and I still don't think
>
> it is perfect. It is good, but not perfect.

Ah! Well, I didn't mean the patch was perfect, but the semantics are. ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 12 12:59:50 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.