[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge should copy-with-history

From: William Uther <will+_at_cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 2002-08-12 07:05:25 CEST

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 08:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:

> Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
>> William Uther wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 04:44 PM, Branko ibej wrote:
>>>> No, this is _exactly_ what should be happening.
>>> I'm still not convinced.

> What both of you (Nuuti and William) are missing is the following
> horrible scenario

Um, I wasn't missing it. I was trying to be careful and not say that
the patch was bad, just that it wasn't perfect. Your "_exactly_" above
implied that you thought this patch was perfect, and I still don't think
it is perfect. It is good, but not perfect. Anyway, I'm done being
defensive now :).


\x/ill :-}

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 12 07:06:19 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.