Re: Strict long transactions?

On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 12:31, Karl Fogel wrote:
> By the way, I just tested your claim about CVS in local mode:

> ... and it is not true with CVS 1.11p1 with local repository. Bob was
> able to commit without updating.

I expected Christian to be wrong as well, but I got a surprising result
with CVS 1.10. (Dunno if the version difference is an issue.) I found
that if I did a "cvs ci" with no arguments, I got an up-to-date check
failure, but I could still do a "cvs ci bar", of course. Here is my
command history:

     1 14:26 setenv CVSROOT /tmp/repos
     2 14:27 cvs init
     3 14:27 mkdir $CVSROOT/dir
     4 14:27 cd /tmp
     5 14:27 cvs co dir
     6 14:27 cd dir
     7 14:27 touch foo bar
     8 14:27 cvs add foo bar
     9 14:27 cvs ci -m ''
    10 14:27 cd ..
    11 14:27 cvs co -d dir2 dir
    12 14:27 cd dir
    13 14:27 echo foo > foo
    14 14:27 cd ../dir2
    15 14:27 echo bar > bar
    16 14:27 cd ../dir
    17 14:27 cvs ci -m ''
    18 14:28 cd ../dir2
    19 14:28 cvs ci -m ''
    20 14:28 cvs ci -m '' bar
    21 14:29 cvs --version

Command 19 yielded an error, while command 20 succeeded.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 6 20:38:29 2002