Re: Strict long transactions?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> I expected Christian to be wrong as well, but I got a surprising result
> with CVS 1.10. (Dunno if the version difference is an issue.) I found
> that if I did a "cvs ci" with no arguments, I got an up-to-date check
> failure, but I could still do a "cvs ci bar", of course.

Yes, cvs ci attempts to commit every file in the current directory, and
therefore performs up-to-date checks on all of them. (It then silently
discards from the commit all files that are both up-to-date and have no
local changes.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra_at_stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org