[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Strict long transactions?

From: Russ Allbery <rra_at_stanford.edu>
Date: 2002-08-07 23:08:21 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> I expected Christian to be wrong as well, but I got a surprising result
> with CVS 1.10. (Dunno if the version difference is an issue.) I found
> that if I did a "cvs ci" with no arguments, I got an up-to-date check
> failure, but I could still do a "cvs ci bar", of course.

Yes, cvs ci attempts to commit every file in the current directory, and
therefore performs up-to-date checks on all of them. (It then silently
discards from the commit all files that are both up-to-date and have no
local changes.)

Russ Allbery (rra_at_stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 7 23:08:54 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.